Home

  Editors

  Ethics

  Submission

  Volumes

  Indexing

  Copyright

  Fees

  Subscription

  Publisher

  Support

  EPPM

 

Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2026, 16(2), 2025-35

 

Risk Assessment Framework for BOT Projects in Post-War Reconstruction

 

Ahmad Labach1, Orabi Al Rawi2, Aya Hamdan3, and Nidal M. Hussein4

1 Project Manager, Aladnan Constructions, Daraa City-Almahata, Syria, E-mail: Ahmad.labach1091@gmail.com
2 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan, E-mail: orabi.alrawi@uop.edu.jo (corresponding author).
3 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan, E-mail: nidal.hussein@uop.edu.jo
4 Lab Supervisor, School of Natural Resources, Engineering and Management, German Jordanian University, Amman, Jordan, E-mail: A.Hamdan7@gju.edu.jo

 

Project Management

 

Received February 7, 2025; revised July 29, 2025; September 25, 2025; accepted October 5, 2025

 

Available online March 7, 2026

 

Abstract: Driven by an urgent need for systematic risk assessment of Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) projects in Syria's post-war reconstruction context, this research addresses the critical risk factors specific to BOT projects in post-conflict environments, systematically classifies and prioritizes these risks, and develops a framework for effective risk assessment and management. Using a rigorous mixed-methods approach, we developed a comprehensive risk register that identifies and categorizes 48 distinct risks across five major categories: organization/political, financial/economic, environmental/natural, design/implementation/operation, and humanitarian/materials/equipment. The research methodology consisted of questionnaire responses from 161 industry professionals, including government officials and engineering consultants. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS for validation. Both the impact and the probability of each risk were measured on a five-point Likert scale, and a z-test was used to test the hypothesis. The results indicated that organizational and political risks, specifically the imposition of international sanctions and regional tensions, pose the primary threat to BOT project implementation in Syria, while environmental risks were found to be less critical. The developed risk register provides a structured tool for risk assessment and management, incorporating local contextual factors that are often absent in traditional frameworks. For policymakers, investors, and project managers involved in Syria’s post-conflict reconstruction, this research offers practical insights and contributes to a theoretical understanding of BOT projects more generally.

 

Keywords: Risk register, build-operate-transfer (BOT), post-war reconstruction, infrastructure development, project risk management.

Copyright © Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM-Journal).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Requests for reprints and permissions at eppm.journal@gmail.com.

Citation: Labach, A., Rawi, O. A., Hamdan, A., and Hussein, N. M. (2026). Risk Assessment Framework for BOT Projects in Post-War Reconstruction. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 16(2), 2025-35.

DOI: 10.32738/JEPPM-2025-35

Full Text


Copyright © EPPM-Journal. All rights reserved.