Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2022, 12(1), 13-24
Construction Strategic Project Readiness Assessment
1Senior
Lecturer, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University
of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, U.S., E-mail: msmahdisafa@gmail.com
(corresponding author).
2Associate
Professor, College of Business, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710,
U.S.
3Professor,
College of Business, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, U.S.
4Assistant
Professor, Department of Management, University of Delhi, 75/2, Ram
Nagar Extension, Delhi, India
5CEO,
Valency Inc., St, Suite 1, Waterloo, ON N2V 2B3, Canada
Project Management
Received December 26, 2020; revised April 15, 2021; May 23, 2021; accepted June 5, 2021
Available online July 1, 2021
Abstract: Proper use of construction strategic management consists of strategic planning for controlling the implementation of strategies during front-end planning (FEP). To improve FEP effort, industry best practice instrument, i.e., Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) has been used to ensure continued alignment and focus on strategic project priorities. This study proposes a methodology for creating a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis of big post-mining data from organizations that have implemented PDRI, as a standardized tool used across capital project portfolios. The results show that the proposed methodology has the potential to improve project success when applied as a benchmark of baseline conditions, the element level.
Keywords: Project management; knowledge management; information technology, construction.
Copyright © Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM-Journal).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
Requests for reprints and permissions at eppm.journal@gmail.com.
Citation: Safa, M., Weeks, K., ELHoubi, A., Sharma, N., and MacGillivray, S. (2022). Construction Strategic Project Readiness Assessment. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 12(1), 13-24.
DOI:
10.32738/jeppm-2022-0002
Full Text
