Home

  Editors

  Ethics

  Submission

  Volumes

  Indexing

  Copyright

  Fees

  Subscription

  Publisher

  Support

  EPPM

Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2016, 6(2), 104-119

 

Critical Phases in the Process of Awarding Public Procurement Contracts: A Romania Case Study

 

Mirela Violeta Patraș1 and Cristian Silviu Bănacu2

1PhD Candidate, Management Department, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piața Romană Street, no. 6, First Sector, Bucharest, Romania, Mailing Address, E-mail: mirela_mialtu@yahoo.com (corresponding author).

2Professor, Management Department, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piața Romană Street, no. 6, First Sector, Bucharest, Romania, Mailing Address, E-mail: cristian.banacu@gmail.com

 

Project Management

 

Received January 11, 2016; received revisions February 14, 2016; March 11, 2016; April 22, 2016; accepted April 24, 2016

 

Available online June 13, 2016

 

Abstract: Public procurement is an important part of the current economic reality. The economic development of Romanian companies taking part in the bidding process closely depends on the national public system and it cannot be achieved without an efficient and correct procurement process. This study is focused on the irregularities found as a result of a complex research regarding the public procurement system. The main objective of this research is to build a model- an applicable strategy for identifying irregularities in procurement procedures and, as such avoiding them, by taking into consideration the particularities of the bidding process, its content and methods. The number of procurement appeals gives information about participant companies’ level of dissatisfaction, while the number of the admitted appeals shows the real leaks from the system. Considering these aspects, the current paper discusses about the public procurement process and it presents the critical phases of the public procurement procedure, by emphasizing the possible weaknesses and activities that can generate irregularities in this area. Thus, by analyzing the content of many officially admitted complaints related to the public bidding process, the paper reveals the main problematic aspects of the public procurement system, contributing thus to improvement and increased satisfaction for all participants taking part in the process.

 

Keywords: Public procurement, critical phases, complains, irregularities, development.

Copyright © Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM-Journal).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.

Requests for reprints and permissions at eppm.journal@gmail.com.

Citation: Patras, M. V. and Banacu, C. S. (2016). Critical Phases in the Process of Awarding Public Procurement Contracts: A Romania Case Study. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 6(2), 104-119.

DOI: 10.32738/JEPPM.201607.0004

Full text

 


Copyright © EPPM-Journal. All rights reserved.