Home

  Editors

  Ethics

  Submission

  Volumes

  Indexing

  Copyright

  Fees

  Subscription

  Publisher

  Support

  EPPM

 

Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2026, 16(8), 2024-83

 

Safety Constructability of Different Project Delivery Methods on Construction Projects

 

Ali A. Karakhan1, Mohammed Azeez2, Mahmoud Shakouri3, and John Gambatese4

1 Associate Professor, Department of Reconstruction and Projects, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq 10071, E-mail: karakhan@uobaghdad.edu.iq (corresponding author).
2 Lecturer, Department of Reconstruction and Projects, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq 10070, E-mail: mohammed.n.azeez@uotechnology.edu.iq
3 Associate Professor, Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, E-mail: Mahmoud.Shakouri@colostate.edu
4 Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, E-mail: john.gambatese@oregonstate.edu

 

Project Management

 

Received February 13, 2024; revised July 1, 2025; May 5, 2026; accepted September 9, 2026

 

Available online October 5, 2026

 

Abstract: Design professionals play a pivotal role in shaping the built environment, not only through the development of drawings and technical specifications but also by serving as a proxy between project owners and constructors in certain project delivery methods. Every design must fulfill the owner’s objectives and project specific criteria that include quality, cost, time, and, crucially, construction safety, all of which can vary across projects. The study objective was to investigate the extent to which designers prioritize worker safety during the design phase across three categories of project delivery methods: non-collaborative, collaborative, and mixed. To achieve the study objective, an online survey was utilized to collect data from 62 designers working in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. Following survey data collection, statistical analysis was used to examine the extent to which designers focus on worker safety relative to other design criteria for each delivery method. The survey findings reveal that, within the studied sample, designers’ attention to construction worker safety remained relatively consistent regardless of the delivery method employed. Thus, no statistically significant relationship was found between the delivery method and the degree of safety emphasis among designers. However, collaborative delivery methods that foster greater transparency and interdisciplinary engagement are expected to positively influence project safety performance. Industry stakeholders interested in improving safety performance are encouraged to adopt collaborative delivery approaches and implement structured interventions, such as formal safety constructability reviews, to actively integrate safety into the early stages of project design.

 

Keywords: Design; safety; delivery methods; contracts.

Copyright © Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM-Journal).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Requests for reprints and permissions at eppm.journal@gmail.com.

Citation: Karakhan, A. A., Azeez, M., Shakouri, N., and Gambatese, J. (2026). Safety Constructability of Different Project Delivery Methods on Construction Projects . Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 16(8), 2024-83.

DOI: 10.32738/JEPPM-2024-83

Full Text


Copyright © EPPM-Journal. All rights reserved.